{"id":5569,"date":"2023-01-06T08:02:33","date_gmt":"2023-01-06T07:02:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/europepublic.com\/idaho-supreme-court-upholds-near-total-abortion-ban\/"},"modified":"2023-01-06T08:02:33","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T07:02:33","slug":"idaho-supreme-court-upholds-near-total-abortion-ban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/europepublic.com\/idaho-supreme-court-upholds-near-total-abortion-ban\/","title":{"rendered":"Idaho Supreme Court upholds near-total abortion ban"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
<\/p>\n
Justice Robyn Brody, who wrote the majority opinion, rejected arguments from abortion-rights proponents that the right to abortion is implied in the state\u2019s constitution \u2014 saying that to do so there must be evidence that the right was \u201cdeeply rooted\u201d in the state\u2019s history and traditions at the time it was written.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe relevant history and traditions of Idaho show abortion was viewed as an immoral act and treated as a crime,\u201d Brody wrote. \u201cThus, we cannot conclude the framers and adopters of the Inalienable Rights Clause intended to implicitly protect abortion as a fundamental right.\u201d<\/p>\n
She added, however, that nothing in the decision prevents the voters from amending the state constitution or electing new legislators to change the law.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe emphasize that all we are deciding today is that the Idaho Constitution, as it currently stands, does not include a fundamental right to abortion,\u201d Brody wrote.<\/p>\n