Israel’s leaders must find compromise on legislation that is tearing country apart, White House says



Protests against the measures have been widespread for weeks. Opponents have characterized the plans as anti-democratic and a boost to Netanyahu’s power at a time when the prime minister himself is facing criminal charges.

“It’s an attack on the very soul and nature of our democracy,” former Prime Minister Ehud Barak said earlier this month. Barak urged Israelis to resort to mass civil disobedience to block the judicial reforms.

On Saturday, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant spoke out against the legislation; on Sunday, Netanyahu fired him, saying, “We must all stand strong against refusal.”

Protests against Gallant’s firing immediately broke out in Israel’s major cities. The Associated Press reported that “protesters in Tel Aviv blocked a main highway and lit large bonfires, while police scuffled with protesters who gathered outside Netanyahu’s private home in Jerusalem.”

The White House statement said that disagreements over Netanyahu’s current policies would not disrupt the U.S.-Israel relationship, which traditionally has been very close.

“U.S. support for Israel’s security and democracy remains ironclad,” the statement said.

Given America’s close relationship with Israel, and the Biden administration’s general hesitation to openly criticize such an important Middle Eastern ally, the White House statement on Sunday was relatively pointed.

The administration has known for a while that this Netanyahu-led coalition is an unusually extreme one, but it had hoped that Netanyahu could keep it in line. The prime minister had insisted that the far-right members of his coalition were joining him and not the other way around, and that he was in charge.

As a result, Biden administration officials had said they intended to hold him responsible for whatever happened. But they were also keenly aware of the many factors that Netanyahu is juggling, including his desire to avoid further prosecution on corruption charges — one of the reasons he is believed to have acquiesced to some of the demands of his coalition partners.

When asked on Sunday whether the administration had any immediate Israel-related plans beyond issuing the statement, U.S. officials did not offer comment.



Source link: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/26/israel-protests-judicial-reform-legislation-00088905

Sponsors

spot_img

Latest

Twitter adds blue checks to accounts of dead celebrities

When Elon Musk first announced Twitter would start charging for verification, he the company’s legacy “lords & peasants” system was “bullshit.” Now,...

Russia to ditch one of its two leaky space station ships over the ocean

Russia will dispose of a leaky supply ship that had been docked at the International Space Station this weekend, allowing it to burn...

Patrick Beverley says he wants to knock the Lakers out of the playoffs

Does former Laker Patrick Beverley have a personal vendetta against the team that traded him to the Magic two weeks ago? Source link: https://sports.yahoo.com/torrey-craig-viewed-player-sixers-194240118.html?src=rss...

I Made My Husband the Hero of My Memoir; Then My Marriage Ended

I did not dedicate my book to my husband — even though, in nearly a third of the essays, he’s portrayed as the...

Toward Fairer Data-Driven Performance Management

Meritocracy matters. A company that rewards talent, effort, and achievement can be expected to outperform those where nepotism, systemic biases, toxic politics, and...