Judge Demands List of All Indirect Co-Owners of OpenAI, in Libel Lawsuit Against OpenAI


In Walters v. OpenAI, LLC, plaintiff sued OpenAI after it hallucinated false statements about plaintiff (in response to a query by a third party). Plaintiff sued in Georgia state court, and OpenAI removed the case to federal court, on the theory that this is a lawsuit between citizens of different states and has at least $75,000 at issue (so-called “diversity jurisdiction”). But OpenAI, LLC is a “limited liability company,” and under federal law an LLC is the citizen of all the states where its members (i.e., co-owners) are citizens; and if the members are LLCs, then the LLC is the citizen of all the states where its members’ members are citizens, and so on, indefinitely.

OpenAI therefore had to file a declaration discussing the citizenship of its members, which it did. But Friday’s order from Judge Michael L. Brown (N.D. Ga.) says that’s not enough:

Defendant still has not shown the Court has diversity jurisdiction because it has not yet established the citizenship of OpenAI Holdings, LLC and Aestas Management Company, LLC (both of which are entities in Defendant’s membership structure). Defendant claims (1) OpenAI Holdings, LLC has “[m]embers who are citizens of California and Michigan, or are citizens of other countries”; and (2) “Aestas Management Company, LLC’s members are citizens of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, North Dakota, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington, or are citizens of other countries, but not Georgia.” (Dkt. 22 paras. 13c, 14.) These allegations are insufficient. Defendant must affirmatively identify by name each member of an LLC and then allege whatever specific facts are necessary to establish the citizenship of that member. The Court will give Defendant one last chance to do so. Defendant must file, no later than October 6, 2023, a single consolidated document showing the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Failure to do so will result in remand [to state court].

I expect that OpenAI will indeed file this comprehensive list, that its lawyers have confirmed that none of the indirect members are citizens of Georgia (where Walters is a citizen), and the case will thus stay in federal court. Still, I expect that some businesspeople and journalists will find it interesting to have this whole ownership structure revealed in one handy document.



Source link: https://reason.com/volokh/2023/09/26/judge-demands-list-of-all-indirect-co-owners-of-openai-in-libel-lawsuit-against-openai/

Sponsors

spot_img

Latest

Court Blocks N.Y. Law Mandating Posting of “Hateful Conduct” Policies by Social Media Platforms (Including Us)

From Volokh v. James, decided today by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. (S.D.N.Y.): "Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion,...

Beata Heuman Home: 5 Things I Love About It

I encounter plenty of beautiful homes while browsing the internet and the pages of my favorite publications, yet some stand out more than...

Italy claim first title since 1976!

Davis Cup: Italy claim first title since 1976! © Clive Brunskill / Staff - Getty Images Sport Italy claimed its first Davis Cup crown...

Stuart Hogg reacts as Hawick memorial defaced with abusive remarks about him

Former Scotland captain Stuart Hogg has hit back at vandals who defaced a memorial in his hometown, Hawick, with a vulgar message...

L’Oréal has a device to help folks with limited mobility apply lipstick

At CES 2023, L’Oréal unveiled two new devices that solve some very different problems. HAPTA is a machine that helps people with limited...